Am I remote viewing or writing a novel.

Anyone interested in the terminology and definition of remote viewing and what constitutes remote viewing just has to point their eyes to one of the best and informative threads on this subject on PJ’s TKR website.

PJ as always so eloquently details the defining parameters that determines if the process is remote viewing and why each of these is needed – take any away and you could be left holding a work of fiction akin to the Davinci Code – which might not be too bad if you could publish it and make yourself a couple of hundred million like Dan Brown J

As a guide the parameters needed for it to fully be termed Remote viewing are:

1. A remote target (anything, anywhere)
2. Deliberate and focused phsychic functioning (you doing your stuff)
3. Blind/double-blind targeting (the actual target hidden from you)
4. The psychic data is recorded (paper/pen, audio, typed, others)
5. FEEDBACK (The kicker – if you don’t have it how do you know you achieved psi functioning?)

Of course this is the real world and every active viewer has been tasked at least one target whereby there isn’t full feedback. Does this mean it wasn’t or can’t be Remote Viewing – well officially yes! After all the feedback determines if you actually used PSI – or your imagination. But without feedback you could say it was WRV.

What’s WRV you ask?

Waiting Remote Viewing – waiting for feedback to prove if the recorded data is PSI/imagination – then like a miraculous butterfly from pupae it transforms into actual Remote viewing or a moth if you had a particuarly bad session..lol...

Anyway anyone interested should check out the thread – it’s been the most educational in a while – oh and I started it of course (troublemaker).